Archive for September, 2006

h1

Historic Designation… Yay or Nay?

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

The monthly meeting for the Murray Hill Preservation Associating is being held tomorrow night, September 28 at the Murray Hill Presbyterian Church at 7:00 pm.  Tomorrow nights guest is scheduled to be Jim Overton, the City of Jacksonville Property Appraiser to discuss how a Historic Designation would affect the neighborhood of Murray Hill.  Local Historic designation is established and monitored by The City of Jacksonville Planning Department.  The City of Jacksonville Planning Department website discusses Historic Designation.

Historic Designation is the process by which a site, structure, or area is officially recognized as having historical, architectural, or archaeological significance.  It is the primary means for identifying and protecting Jacksonville’s historic resources.

Designation for Historic status is different for a structure opposed to an area such as Murray Hill.  For a neighborhood to be designated as Historical the following applies:

Historic District designations recognize multiple properties. Historic Districts must meet at least two of the criteria identified above and the following:

· Its character is a geographically definable area or neighborhood possessing a significant concentration, or continuity of sites, buildings, objects or structures united in past events, or united in culture, architectural style, or aesthetically by plan or physical development.

Currently there are three local areas that are considered Historic: Riverside / Avondale, Springfield, and the St. Johns Quarter, which borders Riverside / Avondale.  There are other areas though where Historic Designation can be obtained on a case by case basis, namely the Downtown District.  After an area has successfully gone through the review and approval process to become Historic it will forever be scrutinized when it comes to construction or demolition within its boundaries.  For any property owner to alter the exterior of their property or demolish any portions of the main structure (detached garages do not apply) it must obtain a COA (Certificate of Appropriateness) from The Jacksonville Historic Preservation Commission at the Planning Department.  Most COA’s for minor repairs or improvements can be approved within three days of the application but anything more than minor will have to go before The Jacksonville Historic Preservation Commission for a public hearing and review.  This process can take substantially more than three days.  The commission reviews the proposed projects to ensure that they are historically consistent with regards to architectural styles, details, guidelines, and standards.  These COA’s must be obtained by The Planning Department before a zoning administrator will even open your plans for a permit plan review.

Historic Designation doesn’t have to be all gloom and doom though.  In 1992 the State of Florida passed a bill that mandates that local governments provide a partial tax exemption to properties that are deemed Historic by the appropriate authorities.  The City of Jacksonville enacted this by approving an ad valorem tax exemption for locally historically designated properties that go through substantial renovations.  This tax exemption was designed to encourage people to become historically designated, purchase historic properties and improve them, as well as inspire existing owner’s to improve their historic property.  This tax exemption can be quite lucrative.  A property that is locally Historically Designated is eligible to deduct 100% of the ad valorem tax assessed by The City of Jacksonville for the portion of the improvements made to the property for the exemption period, which I believe is 10 years.  That could amount to tens of thousands of dollars.  All those crazy people in Springfield buying pieces and fixing them up don’t look so silly now huh?

The question though to be assessed by Jim Overton is would this be good for Murray Hill?  It is a yes and no.  My personal opinion is it would be good for the area south of Edgewood Avenue.  On that side of Murray Hill there seems to be more affluent home owners that would relish in “Living in a Historic Area” thereby making it that much more attractive to prospective buyers.  On the north side of Edgewood there is still quite a bit of renovating to be done.  This would be good for people seeking the tax exemption, but many owners and buyers could perceive the designation as more of a deterrent than attractor.  Before the housing market slow down in the past 4-6 months people in Murray Hill were flipping houses left and right with each one making their own little improvements.  This would not be nearly as easy with Historic designations requiring anyone who even wanted to paint the exterior of their house having to get a COA.  It would in my opinion slow the housing renovation drive in Murray Hill.  Not to mention all those who are improving their property without the require permits, but hey improve away as long as it does the same to my property values.  For me though, I like the idea.  I wouldn’t mind taking the extra time and care to navigate the COA and permitting process to improve my property, but I can’t speak for those around me who I hope are planning on improving theirs soon.  But long story short…..Imagine NO VINYL SIDING ALLOWED.  Sweet

h1

Aura Thai on the Music Scene

Friday, September 15, 2006

Check out this post from Urban Jacksonville.  This one slipped by I need to get back in action.  Good looking out Schmiles.

h1

Who Said Gaming Machines?

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

I ran across some current news on the Billiard Parlor to be located at the old Woods Pharmacy on the Murray Hill Neighbors website.  It is concerning the use of gaming machines at the establishment that has caused uproar since it was mentioned at the exception hearing before the Planning Commission back in July.  In a recent post I discussed this contentious point at length and still don’t understand what the problem is.  As someone who took the time to read the minutes from the entire hearing on E-06-24 my opinion is still that the owners of the establishment hypothetically mentioned that gaming machines at that location would be legal under the current zoning laws.  They did not say that is what they wanted only that they could do it, by law, where the Billiard Parlor was being opposed.  Maybe I don’t have all the facts on the owner’s intentions or I am reading the hearing minutes incorrectly.  Here is an excerpt from the minutes from the original exception hearing in which Tim Franklin (I assume the owner’s legal council) talks about what the owner could and would do if his application for an exception allowing many pool tables were denied.

 

“Were Mr. Goff here for any other reason, simply to turn a profit or get something going and sell this as opposed to following his dream here, he would most likely open up a sports bar, frankly, serving beer and wine in conjunction with the sale of food, order from a menu and served on premises.

 

He’s got two pool tables, allowed by right.  He would have a number of dart boards, which there is no limitation in the code on.  In addition, he would have a number of online gaming facilities there and big screen televisions.  The same thing you would see that the –for a lack of a better term, the sports bar concept. As they will tell you, your staff, able staff will tell you that’s permitted by right in the zoning district.”

Now I may be crazy, but what was stated at the meeting is the exact opposite of  “I want to have online gaming machines in my bar”.  There may be more that meets the eye and I have not talked to the owner but I think everyone is missing the boat here. 

With that said, there was a new bill introduced to the Jacksonville City Council that intends to restrict the use of gaming machines in the Jacksonville city limits.  Though it is a city wide restriction it appears to be directed at this particular location.  The bill is separate from the City of Jacksonville ongoing litigation to determine whether amusement gambling machines are illegal under current Florida statues.  Ordinance 2006-739 would restrict the use of amusement gambling machines only to establishment that are considered amusement centers.

“A bona fide amusement center is an establishment that derives 50 percent of its revenue through one or a combination of the following:

1)                  the sale of food, which is ordered from a menu, prepared and served for pay for consumption on the premises only, and

2)                  the operation of video, pin ball machines, pool tables or other recreational machines or devices which do not entitle the person operating the machine to receive points or coupons.”

The Murray Hill Neighbors community news report leads you to believe that this bill introduced by Council Members Jenkins, Davis, Fussell, Daniels, Johnson, and Yates is in reference to the proposed Billiard Parlor on Edgewood but I do not see the correlation.  I would like to see how this bill could affect the likes of the dog tracks, Dave & Buster’s, or Chuck e Cheese for that matter before I worry about the effect it is going to have on the new Billiard Parlor on the First Block